Posted 3 days ago

The Quadracci Building :)

The MAM recently gained international recognition with the construction of the white concrete Quadracci Pavilion, designed by Santiago Calatrava (his first completed project in the United States), which opened on May 4, 2001. The pavilion was engineered by the Milwaukee-based engineering firm, Graef, while the construction manager was also Milwaukee-based, C.G. Schmidt. The structure contains a movable, wing-like brise soleil which opens up for a wingspan of 217 feet during the day, folding over the tall, arched structure at night or during inclement weather. The brise soleil has since become a symbol for the city of Milwaukee. In addition to a gallery devoted to temporary exhibits, the pavilion houses the museum’s store and its restaurant, Cafe Calatrava. The pavilion received the 2004 Outstanding Structure Award from the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.

The museum is home to over 25,000 works of art. Its permanent holdings contain an important collection of Old Masters and 19th-century and 20th-century artwork, as well as some of the nation’s best collections of German Expressionism, folk and Haitian art, American decorative arts, and post-1960 American art. The museum holds a large number of works by Georgia O’Keeffe, as well as many works by the German Expressionist, Gabriele Münter.

It also has paintings by these European painters: Nardo di CioneFrancesco Botticini, Jan Swart Van Groningen, Ferdinand Bol, Jan Goyen, Hendrick Van Vliet, Franz Von Lenbach (“Bavarian Girl”), Ferdinand Waldmüller (“Interruption”), Carl Spitzweg, Christian Bokelman (“Broken Bank”), BougereauGerome (“2 Majesties”), Claude Monet (“Waterloo Bridge, Sunset Effect”), Gustave CaillebotteCamille Pissarro, Alfred Kowalski (“Winter in Russia”), Jules Bastien-Lepage’s “The Wood Gatherer”, and Max Pechstein.

( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milwaukee_Art_Museum )

MORE thoughts on the Quadracci Pavilion 

I think Caltrava’s work creates a very bold statement. Each of the buildings has a very distinctive style, which try to move away from traditional shaped buildings. this is mainly showed in the likes of curves, it can be compared to many other buildings like the sydney opera house. i believe these sort of buildings, will always be classed as modernism. because it is very natural with the curved shapes, and i believe modernism is deprived from what is ‘hot right now’ and things that are in fashion or style, and having something based on a natural occurrence, or deprived from nature will never get old, because plants will always be around us and the comparison can always be made :)

Further Reading

some other buildings that could have been inspired from nature and will always be popular pieces to the public are buildings like the sydney opera house,It was conceived and built by architect Jørn Utzon

Posted 6 days ago

Mies van der Rohe Pavilion Review

“One of the architectural masterpieces of the Bauhaus School, the legendary Pavelló Mies van der Rohe—the German contribution to the 1929 International Exhibition, reassembled between 1983 and 1986—remains a stunning “less is more” study in interlocking planes of white marble, green onyx, and glass. In effect, it is Barcelona’s aesthetic antonym (possibly in company with Richard Meier’s Museu d’Art Contemporani de Barcelona, Rafael Moneo’s Auditori, and the Mediterranean Gothic Santa Maria del Mar) to the hyper-Art Nouveau Palau de la Música and the city’s myriad Gaudí spectaculars. Don’t fail to note the matching patterns in the green onyx panels or the mirror play of the black carpet inside the pavilion with the reflecting pool outside, or the iconic Barcelona chair designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (1886-1969); reproductions of the chair have graced modern interiors around the world for decades.”

( http://www.fodors.com/world/europe/spain/barcelona/review-101314.html )

Posted 3 weeks ago

My thoughts on architectural design - Modernism

Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe

Ludwig Mies van der Rohe (March 27, 1886, Aachen – August 17, 1969, Chicago) was a German-American architect.[1] He is commonly referred to, and was addressed, as Mies, his surname. Along with Walter GropiusLe Corbusier and Oscar Niemeyer, he is widely regarded as one of the pioneering masters of modern architecture

Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe’s work is very simple. He appears to tend to work on one floor and keep the shape very simple. The use of rectangles and squares potentially makes the building appear boring. To me i feel that when you look at the building you can automatically tell what is going on inside, this is because it is so open. i think this is why i think the building is so dull. the one thing i like about looking at buildings is at first you can look at the outside and be amazed by the shape, design and texture of a building. and then you can go inside and see it from a totally different angle, and a different design and feel

To me,  location is just is important as the shape of the building.  Van der Rohe’s buildings encourage us to look out of the interior to linger on the exterior environment. Inside merges with outside through large windows and open plan living.

i think that if you were to move this building and place it in a more structural place like a city the effect would be lessened greatly, it would seem a lot less peaceful, but i think because most of the buildings are on stilts and have little walls then it would still stand out in a crowded area. i think this is because even though it is very simplistic it is still completely different from any other building you would see in a city. but for full affect it needs to be placed in a natural environment.

 see: http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/Barcelona_Pavilion.html

Overall I think the effect is a nice and peaceful tranquil sort of feeling created through the simplistic style. In addition, the buildings seem to be very open, letting in lots of light. If you were inside one of these buildings you could still have a feeling of being outside.


Santiago Caltrava

Santiago Calatrava Valls (Valencian pronunciation: [santiˈaɣo kalaˈtɾava ˈvaʎs], born 28 July 1951) is a Spanish architectsculptor and structural engineer whose principal office is in Zürich, Switzerland. Classed now among the elite designers of the world, he has offices in Zürich, Paris, Valencia, and New York City.

( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santiago_Calatrava ) 

Even though I like these buildings, I find them to be very aggressive. There seems to be a lot of focus on angular shapes and piece that just fly out into your face and attract your attention, not to mention the light effect on the building. To me, the building with the light effect looks very alien, not only do the lights create this unusual style, but also the shape, it reminds me of a space ship. Something very futuristic, something that appears to have alot of movement for a stationary object.

 This is the Quadracci Pavillion  - part of the Milwaukee Museum.


To me the work of these two designers is very different. Van der Rohe can be seen to create work that satisfies only one person, making single floored (often residential) buildings that are small and are meant to be enjoyed on their own. In contrast, Calatrava’s work is very different, his buildings are large and extravagant. I think they are designed and built for many people’s tastes.

not only does the Quadracci Pavillion make a statement by being a complex and abstract shape in such an open and simplistic area, but it also has great impact to stand out in the crowd, this not only helps the community to enjoy the are more but can also attract lots on tourism to the area, many people will want to see this strange type of building and enjoy it, the building is trying to pull people from all areas. To me, this is why Calatrava’s work is so complex and abstract as it is trying to apply to everyones taste and to amaze a lot of people.

FURTHER READING

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW7xiPBYFB0     ….this link shows a video of the Brise Soleil wings closing on the Quadracci Pavilion, really good design, that somehow manages to change how you look at the building. it reminds me of a bird, but also a spaceship. it kind of strengthens my view of the pavilion looking very much alien 

Posted 3 weeks ago

My Reflection on Paula Scher’s work

The above picture is a few pieces by Paula Scher. the first is just a simple piece that she has made, when looking through lots of her work i realised a lot of it is very complicated and to me very colourful. i like this first one because of the concept of the ticking boxes which are at the bottom of the page. i like how all this bad critism comes out of one box, and the person who is voting has ticked the other box, it is very quirky and interesting, and has slight humour to it that makes me like her work. 

The second piece when i first looked at it, i didnt like it at all i found it was to complicated and there was way to many colours but as i looked closer and realised what the picture was about, i loved it. it is about a the tsunami that happened in the east. i think the only reason i didn’t like it was that it hurt my eyes, it was too much to look at but what made me change my mind and enjoy it was the clever concept behind it. it is a touchy subject but she portrays it in a nice non threatening way, there is no insulting words or anything to upset someones feeling, she is just portraying a natural disaster in her own way and i really enjoy how she has done it. i would like to think that the image was huge, i would like to walk into a room and see it on a massive wall, if it was really small i think it would lose some of its impact, its needs to be portrayed big much like a tsunami is massive.

Below shows a picture of Scher in front of her tsunami picture, i can tell from this that the image is really large, i’m glad its large as it not only gives the image more meaning but to me would be easy to look and you would be more amazed by the detail that has gone in it.

Posted 3 weeks ago

My Reflection on Michael Graves J Chair

The chair above is known as the ‘J Chair’ Designed by Michael Graves. (postmodernism) from what i have researched, the chair has been auctioned and its price tag was £18,000 - £22,000. to be honest i do not think its worth that much. i was looking through some other items in the auction and there is much better pieces like below

thom mayne untitled desk 10 Architects Chair aution at Wright

this piece is by Thom Mayne and it is valued at £70.000 - £90,000 i think this piece is much more interesting than Graves piece, it seems to have more of an engineer type of view, being very complex and sleek. not only does the piece show more class and style it seems to be manufactured better, unlike Graves j chair it has no rivets or connecting pieces that hold it all together. i think this is mainly why i dislike graves chair because you can see how it all fits together. this makes it look less appealing and i would much prefer if you couldn’t see these.

My Comparison To a Modernist Designer

Above is a chair by le Corbusier. its boring its to simple and there is nothing unique about it. Corbusier is a modernism style artist, so i can understand that it is simple but this to me is too simple, there were some piece by Shiro Kuramata that were very simple but they still had a uniqueness about them and could become very intriguing when observed or used. Corbusier’s armchair is both boring and when you use it it is still boring, so in this case i would rather sit on Graves chair as it has more interesting shapes and is more visually pleasing. even though i don’t like Graves chair as much as other pieces i still feel it has more interest than corbusier’s. 

corbusier does have the aspect of having a frame that his chair fits into but again, he could have done so much with this, in terms of shape and colour but still as he does is a simple black chair that is uninteresting to look at. 

Postmodernism wins in this area!

Thoughts on Graves Building Design

Even though Graves chair could be better, i have to point out that his house design is very interesting to me, it is simple but in a way is completely different and surreal to any house i have ever seen or would ever live in, i like how there is more than one shape but they still all manage to fit in as a nice and clean group. Very Nice! 

( http://plusmood.com/2008/12/10-architects-chair-aution-at-wright/ )

Posted 3 weeks ago

weandthecolor:

Modern Package Design

Contrabriefing, a designed studio from Spain created the package design for Pacharán Pamplonica.

“Licores Baines reinvents the traditional world of its most famous liquor with Pacharán Pamplonica, a new drink targeting young people that provides a visual challenge on finishing the bottle: the special proposal appears on the inside of the rear label, “El Puto Amo”.”

source: lovelypackage.com

Posted 3 weeks ago

weandthecolor:

Creative Calendar Design.

Calendar 2012, created by Lo Siento as giveaway. On each cart is a polyhedron with a number of pieces, corresponding with the number of each month.

Posted 1 month ago
Posted 1 month ago
Posted 1 month ago

Postmodernism Vs Modernism

Postmodernism 3D

Michael graves

Charles Moore

Frank Gehry

Postmodernism 2D

Paula Scher

David Carson

Neville Brody

Barbara Kruger

Modernism 2D

Herbert Bayers

Joost Smidt

Modernism 3D

Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe

Le Carbusier


Posted 1 month ago

Words we did not fully understand from ‘Postmodernism at the V&A’ (Zak, Jake, James & Josh - REBLOG!)

zak-l:

Retrievalism - Zak, Jake, James and Josh

futurist - Zak, Jake, James and Josh

pluralism - Zak, Jake, James and Josh

tidykins - Zak, Jake, James and Josh

capatalist - Zak, Jake, James and Josh

democatised - Zak, Jake, James and Josh

productavists - Zak, Jake, James and Josh

heirarchical - Zak

untenable - Zak, Jake

——————————-

Posted 1 month ago

Postmodernism at the V&A

zak-l:

http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/videos/p/postmodernism-at-the-v-and-a/

Andrew Logan: Post modernism – yes, I still really don’t understand what post modernism is. I’ve been told many times and it’s been explained to me many times and I still am bewildered. But perhaps that’s part of the movement…

Posted 1 month ago

Zaks Thoughts on Postmodernism

here i am sharing what someone else thinks about Postmodernism (Zak Leighton) and showing how i agree with him

“Postmodernism seems very different and colourful, however some postmodernism seems quite dull and boring, (see image 2 of Ceramic modelling from, Carol Mcnicol, Ceramicist), she mentions how expressive and minimal Ceramics are, I would agree, however I still find it colourless and lifeless, I prefer things to be more creative and different. So I would argue to me Postmodernism is a word used to describe major changes in the way people think, especially the way people view truth and reality. But, taking things further back, before we lived in modern times, the world was considered pre-modern. It helps to consider the main differences in these three eras. But arguably I still feel its dull and boring, however it has changed they way we think and the way others think towards culture and society when it comes to Art & Design”

My Thought in relation to what zak has said

Here i agree with Zak, postmodernism is the way people think and the way the world classes it self. it really does depend on the time and era in which the piece of post modernism art was set because it is always constantly changing. but now that Zak has mention the colourless a dull colours i have to agree with him, there seem to be more pieces that are dull, such as plane grey brick buildings, than there are colourful pieces

(Source: zak-l)

Posted 1 month ago

My Thoughts on Shiro Kuramata’s (postmodernism) work and relationship with art deco

i love these chest of draws by Shiro Kuramata. they take influence from the Art Deco artist Piet Mondrian. i like this connection to art deco, taking something that is as simple as Mondrian’s work and turning it into something very clever and unique. it is something i would want to have in my house and will likely never go out of fashion, the sleekness of the design as well as the shape and use of colour is not something that everyone will suddenly dislike. i think this is the main reason art deco and other similar things will always be in fashion because they are so simple, but can have a big impact on some people

To be honest i feel Piet Mondrians work is too boring for me, there is being simple, but there is also being lazy. if the image is clever in someway simplicity is ok for me, but if it is just plain simple and has no meaning i lose a lot of interest in the piece… But when the same design is added to something three dimensional, it becomes something new and incredibly interesting. making the drawes around the the design is just genius 

Posted 1 month ago

Shiro Kuramata
Japanese (Tokyo, Japan, 1934 - 1991)
Miss Blanche
1988
furniture | plastic
Not currently on view in the museum

35 7/16 in. x 21 5/8 in. x 23 5/8 in. (90 cm x 55 cm x 60 cm)
Acquired 1991
Collection SFMOMA
Accessions Committee Fund: gift of Mr. and Mrs. Donald Fisher, Mrs. George Roberts, and Mr. and Mrs. Brooks Walker, Jr.
91.27.A-E
Source: http://www.sfmoma.org/explore/collection/artwork/367#ixzz1sxda6q00 San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
“Miss Blanche derives its design from the corsage that Blanche Dubois wore in Tennessee Williams’s A Streetcar Named Desire. The seat, arms, and back are made of clear acrylic resin in which red silk roses seem to float, an ironic memory of chintz upholstery. The gently curving arms and back are joined and proportioned to stand out as individual elements rather than as parts of a whole. The purple anodized aluminum legs are inserted into slots carved out of the underside of the seat”i kinda like this chair but i kind of don’t , i like most of Kuramata’s work and i like the fact that this piece is made of glass and that the back rest is not straight. but the only thing that puts me off from this is the flowers. for some reason is reminds me of art nouveau, i think it is just because of the floral aspect, to me these are out dated and makes the piece feel older than it actually is. 

Shiro Kuramata

Japanese (Tokyo, Japan, 1934 - 1991)

Miss Blanche

1988

furniture | plastic

Not currently on view in the museum



35 7/16 in. x 21 5/8 in. x 23 5/8 in. (90 cm x 55 cm x 60 cm)
Acquired 1991
Collection SFMOMA
Accessions Committee Fund: gift of Mr. and Mrs. Donald Fisher, Mrs. George Roberts, and Mr. and Mrs. Brooks Walker, Jr.
91.27.A-E



Source: http://www.sfmoma.org/explore/collection/artwork/367#ixzz1sxda6q00 
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

“Miss Blanche derives its design from the corsage that Blanche Dubois wore in Tennessee Williams’s A Streetcar Named Desire. The seat, arms, and back are made of clear acrylic resin in which red silk roses seem to float, an ironic memory of chintz upholstery. The gently curving arms and back are joined and proportioned to stand out as individual elements rather than as parts of a whole. The purple anodized aluminum legs are inserted into slots carved out of the underside of the seat”

i kinda like this chair but i kind of don’t , i like most of Kuramata’s work and i like the fact that this piece is made of glass and that the back rest is not straight. but the only thing that puts me off from this is the flowers. for some reason is reminds me of art nouveau, i think it is just because of the floral aspect, to me these are out dated and makes the piece feel older than it actually is.